July 8, 2006

The Criminal Past Of Mitch Freifeld

In an article published by Origination News, Mitch Freifeild, president of Global Net Branch Solutions, admits to having a criminal background that involved charges for passing bad checks and credit card fraud. Freifeld also admitted to having been addicted to prescription drugs.

Although I find it admirable for him to come clean with his criminal past, I can’t help wonder about its timing. Freifeld and Ron Litt of Advantage Credit  launched the Coalition Against Broker Fraud during the NAMB convention in Philadelphia last week.




Permalink • Print • Comment

June 23, 2006

National Mortgage Broker Licensing System

After 18 months of pushing for a uniform licensing system for state residential mortgage regulators, The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) is pairing up with the National Association of Securities Dealers Inc. (NASD) to make it a reality.

CSBS, the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators (AARMR) and the industry have been working for the past year and a half to develop a national licensing system and database that will provide uniform applications for residential mortgage lenders and loan brokers, as well as a central repository of information about licensing and publicly adjudicated enforcement actions. 

The system is targeted at the more than 90,000 companies with 63,000 branches and 280,000 loan officers and other professionals, said a recent CSBS/AARMR survey of 50 state mortgage regulators.

“The national licensing system and repository will enhance the state regulator’s ability to protect consumers through an increased ability to hold industry professionals accountable for their actions,” said CSBS President and CEO Neil Milner. “Fraud and other illegal or unethical behavior, such as predatory lending, should decline as states participate in the system.”

Taking the lead

The system was the brainchild of CSBS when they recognized a need for more consistent regulation and supervision of the mortgage lending industry. CSBS also discovered that no government or self-regulatory organization existed to provide state regulatory agencies, consumers, businesses and law enforcement organizations with information on a regional or national basis about mortgage lenders, brokers and loan officers.

The new system will be a secure Web-based central licensing system and repository containing licensing information, enforcement actions and background data for every participating state-licensed mortgage broker, loan originator and lender. The system will be accessible over the Internet, allowing prospective and current licensees to apply for or renew licenses for one or more jurisdictions over the Internet through a secure Web site. The system will also collect licensing fees at the time of application or renewal and disburse these to the respective state agencies. The system will only process license application or renewals. Each state agency will retain its regulatory authority to approve, deny, suspend or revoke a license.

The database will contain licensing information, enforcement actions and background data. Professionals operating in states without licensing requirements will have the opportunity to submit information voluntarily.

Implementation

Development of the system continues through the summer and expects to be deployed on Jan. 1, 2008. About 10-12 states will participate in the first year, and more than 30 states are expected to join in 2009 and 2010.

“Companies and professionals will only have to complete one online application when applying for license in one or more jurisdictions,” said AARMR Vice President and Taskforce Co-Chairman Chuck Cross. “Both groups will benefit from access to a national licensing and enforcement repository and more homogeneous state regulations that will likely result from the uniform application.”

The system will be accessible to state regulators, licensees and consumers.

“Regulators will have access to licensing, enforcement, criminal, other background information and annual report data as part of the licensing approval and ongoing regulation process,” said CSBS. “(They) will benefit by capitalizing on current technology, centralizing duplicative functions, providing a central point of contact for submitting license applications and assisting the industry in policing itself.

“Licensed lenders and brokers will have access to their license data. Consumers will have access to public licensing and enforcement actions related to licensed mortgage lenders, brokers and loan officers. Both regulators and licensees will be able to generate standard reports from the central licensing repository. Access will vary by group, with regulators having the broadest system-access entitlements.”

CSBS also said industry professionals will benefit from a more streamlined process. 

Eventually, the system will be expanded to offer a call center, a national repository of public enforcement actions, document collection (financial statements, SOS, etc.), fingerprints and criminal checks, background checks, and surety bond and continuing education reporting.

CSBS chose NASD, a self-regulatory organization for the U.S. securities industry, because of the company’s experience operating two national licensing systems for state regulators in the securities and investment advisory industries: the Central Registration Depository and the Investment Adviser Registration Depository. NASD also provides regulatory examiners and investigators with compliance and enforcement tools.

Footing the bill with Ameriquest funds

The system will be developed in multiple phases, the first phase estimated at $4.3 million. Annual operating costs are projected to be between $6.5 and $7.5 million over the next five years. 

CSBS said the costs “will be born by the states, and operating costs will be paid for by the industry in the form of set-up and processing fees.” 

CSBS is currently soliciting funds from state mortgage regulators to fund the system. It will also use funds from the Ameriquest settlement, in which the mortgage giant paid $325 million in restitution and fines to settle allegations that it falsified home values and borrower incomes and used other high pressure and unfair tactics that trapped consumers into burdensome debt. That money, however, has been tagged for system development costs only.

In a recent survey conducted by CSBS and AARMR, 44 state agencies use paper applications for prospective licensees while only six collect new applications electronically. Thirty state agencies indicated they will mandate the use of the system. Seven agencies will make the system available on a voluntary basis, and five agencies indicated that they will not participate in the system at this time.

“The system will streamline the licensing process for state agencies and the industry,” said Bill Matthews, CSBS senior vice president, “through the use of modern technology and centralizing redundant state agency operations.”


Broker Newswire



Permalink • Print • Comment

June 21, 2006

Allied Accused Of Civil Rights Violations


STUART, FL - The National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) filed a civil rights complaint with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) against Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation, the nation’s largest privately held mortgage broker/banker.

The complaint states that several Allied branches quoted less favorable rates and fees to minorities, displayed disrespect, and made racists comments to African Americans.

NCRC conducted the first-ever Broker Fair Lending Audit where mystery shoppers "tested" over 100 mortgage brokers from February 2005 to June 2006 in Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles California; St. Louis, Missouri and the Washington, D.C., metro areas.

NCRC’s complaint alleges that Allied and it’s brokers engaged in racially discriminatory lending practices against African Americans and inhabitants of African-American communities by 1) Quoting different interest rates & fees on the basis of race; 2) Steering African American Consumers to more expensive non-prime products; 3) Not treating African-American applicants for mortgages as seriously as their white counterparts, despite their being more qualified; 4) Providing African-Americans with substandard & discourteous treatment; 5) Limiting access to credit on the basis of race; 6) Differential treatment on the basis of race in representing policies & practices; and 7) making inappropriate comments regarding the characteristics of communities.

Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP Washington Bureau, called upon HUD to investigate the audit results.

 


Permalink • Print • Comment

April 18, 2006

Mortgage Brokers Under HUD Scrutiny

respa1.jpg 

In an April 6 letter to Alphonso Jackson, secretary of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, seven consumer groups made three primary recommendations for the changes HUD should include in the new RESPA rule.  Their suggestions touched on each of the major issues at stake in the reform process:  mortgage broker compensation, improvements to the GFE and the proposed Section 8 exemption. 

The groups signing the letter included ACORN, the Center for Responsible Lending, the Consumer Federation of America, Consumer Action, the National Association of Consumer Advocates, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition and the National Consumer Law Center.  Each of these groups was represented at HUD’s RESPA roundtables last year. 

In their letter, the consumer groups stated their belief that HUD should:

  • Require that a mortgage broker: (a) reach written agreement with each client early in the financing process on the total amount of the broker’s compensation, and (b) provide the consumer with choices regarding how he or she will pay that fee at closing.
  • Require loan originators to provide an early and firm GFE that both itemizes fees and draws attention to important summary information, including an APR alongside the note rate, and loan features such as adjustable rates, prepayment penalties and balloon payments.
  • Maintain all Section 8 anti-kickback rules, without exemptions.

Out with the YSP, in with the broker contract 

In elaborating on the first point, the groups laid out a wholesale attack on the broker’s yield spread premium (YSP).  Calling it “exactly the type of kickback that Congress sought to forbid when it enacted RESPA thirty years ago,” they asked HUD to “curb abusive yield spread premiums” and “amend its substantive regulations on yield spread premiums,” saying that  provisions on disclosure would be “insufficient.” 

Further, “HUD must also reverse its stated prohibition, articulated in its 2001 Policy Statement, against enforcing violations of Section 8 through class actions.”  Read more…..

Permalink • Print • Comment
« Previous Page