May 29, 2006

Fannie Mae’s Creative Accounting



Associated Press

Employees at mortgage giant Fannie Mae manipulated accounting so that executives could collect millions in bonuses as senior management deceived investors and stonewalled regulators at a company whose prestigious image was phony, a federal agency charged Tuesday.

The blistering report by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, the product of an extensive three-year investigation, was issued as the government-sponsored company struggles to emerge from an $11 billion accounting scandal.

Earlier, a person familiar with the situation said that Fannie Mae was being fined between $300 million and $500 million for the alleged manipulation of accounting to facilitate executives’ bonuses, in a settlement with the housing oversight agency.

‘’The image of Fannie Mae as one of the lowest-risk and ‘best in class’ institutions was a facade,'’ James B. Lockhart, the acting director of OFHEO, said in a statement as the report was released. ‘’Our examination found an environment where the ends justified the means. Senior management manipulated accounting, reaped maximum, undeserved bonuses, and prevented the rest of the world from knowing.'’

The report also faulted Fannie Mae’s board of directors for failing to exercise its oversight responsibilities and failing to discover ‘’a wide variety of unsafe and unsound practices'’ at the largest buyer and guarantor of home mortgages in the country.

The OFHEO review, involving nearly 8 million pages of documents, details what the agency calls an arrogant and unethical corporate culture. From 1998 to mid-2004, the smooth growth in profits and precisely-hit earnings targets each quarter reported by Fannie Mae were ‘’illusions'’ deliberately created by senior management using faulty accounting, the report says.

The accounting manipulation tied to executives’ bonuses occurred from 1998 to 2004, according to the report, a much longer period than was previously known.

Regulators had earlier said that Fannie Mae in 1998 improperly put off accounting for $200 million in expenses to future periods so executives could collect $27 million in bonuses.

‘’By deliberately and intentionally manipulating accounting to hit earnings targets, senior management maximized the bonuses and other executive compensation they received, at the expense of shareholders,'’ the report says. The manipulation ‘’made a significant contribution'’ to the compensation of former chairman and chief executive Franklin Raines, which totaled more than $90 million from 1998 to 2003, it says, including some $52 million directly tied to the company hitting earnings targets.

Fannie Mae employees falsified signatures on accounting transactions that helped the company meet the 1998 earnings targets, according to congressional testimony by the former director of OFHEO. The agency first discovered in 2004 the accounting-rule violations and alleged earnings manipulation by Fannie Mae to meet Wall Street targets — disclosures that stunned the financial markets.

In December 2004, the SEC ordered Fannie Mae to restate its earnings back to 2001 — a correction expected to reach an estimated $11 billion. The Justice Department has been pursuing a criminal investigation.

Raines and former chief financial officer Timothy Howard were swept out of office by Fannie Mae’s board in December 2004.

OFHEO levied a record $125 million fine in 2003 against Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae’s smaller rival in the multitrillion-dollar home mortgage market, for misstating earnings — mostly underreporting them — by $5 billion for 2000-2002.

On Friday, Fannie Mae said it was replacing the chairman of its board’s audit committee, a key position as the second-largest U.S. financial institution reworks its accounting and struggles to emerge from the scandal. The company said the board had named accounting professor Dennis Beresford to replace audit committee chairman Thomas Gerrity.




Permalink • Print • Comment

Convicted Felon Caught Originating Mortgages

 

DENVER — Colorado and Alaska are the only two states in the country not requiring regulation of mortgage brokers. That means anyone can call themselves a mortgage broker and gain access to your most critical financial information, including a four-time felon.

In a hidden camera investigation, 7NEWS caught mortgage broker Wayne Martin giving our undercover producer a sales pitch.

"I’ve got a good standing with the state … A lot of the brokers who were kicked out of places out east like Florida are migrating and landing here, and there’s nothing to stop them," Martin said.

Martin believes he’s talking to a prospective customer but he doesn’t realize he’s also talking in front of two hidden cameras.

When a 7NEWS producer asked, "They don’t do background checks or anything, so how do you know you’re not dealing with a crook?"

Martin responded, "You don’t. Unfortunately, today, you don’t."

"How many loans have you done in the past year?" the undercover producer asked.

"Four hundred," Martin said.

"You’ve done 400 loans in the past year? Firemark?" the producer asked.

"Firemark, yes. I’ve personally done about 225," Martin said.

"Do you have a criminal record?" the producer asked.

"No … No criminal record," Martin said.

This moment crystallizes the risk Colorado residents must navigate in the uncharted world of mortgage brokers. During the past several years, 7NEWS investigators have exposed unethical and illegal practices of several mortgage brokers, the financial struggles of their victims and the unsuccessful plans, proposals and promises of state lawmakers.

Lending experts believe the additional risk inside Colorado’s mortgage industry costs everyone in the state higher lending rates. The FBI’s most recent figures rank the state eighth in mortgage fraud.

"It’s incumbent upon anybody that’s getting a home loan to be sure who it is they’re dealing with," said Scott Meiklejohn, the executive director of the Colorado Association of Mortgage Brokers, a trade organization with no regulatory authority.

"If we asked a mortgage broker if he had a criminal history and he lied to us, what would that say to you?" 7NEWS Investigator Tony Kovaleski asked.

"Don’t use that mortgage broker, that’s for sure," Meiklejohn said.

A few days after that morning meeting in front of our hidden cameras, 7NEWS returned to talk to Martin with the cameras rolling.

"He asked you about how many mortgages you’ve done in the last year. Do you remember what you said?" Kovaleski asked.

"I said that I’ve done hundreds," Martin said.

"I think you said 400, your company has done. Was that the truth?" Kovaleski asked.

"Probably not, no," Martin said.

"So you lied about that. How many have you really done?" Kovaleski asked.

"Probably 50," Martin said.

And that was not the only inconsistency in Martin’s story.

"He asked you about your criminal history. Did you tell him the truth?" Kovaleski asked.

"I don’t remember what I said to him," Martin said.

Read more…


Permalink • Print • Comment

Rate Lock Advisory

 

This holiday shortened week brings us the release of five important economic reports, three of the five are considered to be of high importance to the bond market and mortgage pricing. The financial and mortgage markets are closed tomorrow in observance of the Memorial Day holiday and will reopen Tuesday morning.

The Conference Board will start the week’s releases by posting their Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) at 10:00 AM Tuesday. This is an extremely important release that measures consumer willingness to spend. If the index rises, it indicates that consumers feel better about their personal financial situations and are more apt to make large purchases. If confidence is sliding, analysts think consumer spending may slow in the near future. The latter is good news for the bond market because it should ease concerns about inflationary pressures, making bonds more attractive to investors. This should boost bond prices and push mortgage rates lower Tuesday morning. It is expected to show a reading of 100.0 after April’s 109.2.

There is no relevant economic news scheduled for release Wednesday, but we will get to see the minutes from the last FOMC meeting. Market participants will be looking for how Fed members voted for the last rate hike. A unanimous vote could mean that all voting members are still concerned about inflation, meaning that more rate hikes may be coming. However, a divided vote will likely be construed as an indication that the rate hikes may stop in the near future. The minutes will be released at 2:00 PM ET, so if there is an market reaction to them it will be evident during afternoon trading.

The revised 1st Quarter Productivity and Costs report will be released Thursday morning. This data measures employee output and employer costs for wages and benefits. It is considered to be a measurement of wage inflation and is thought to allow low inflationary economic growth when productivity is high. Last month’s preliminary reading revealed a 3.2% rate, but I don’t think this piece of data will have much of an impact on the bond market or mortgage pricing. Current forecasts are showing an upward revision to 4.2%.

The next report also comes Thursday morning with the release of the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing index. Th is highly important index measures manufacturer sentiment. A reading above 50 means that more surveyed manufacturing executives felt that business improved during the month than those who felt it had worsened. Analysts are expecting to see a 55.7 reading in this month’s release, meaning that sentiment slipped during May. A smaller reading will be good news for the bond market and mortgage shoppers while an unexpected increase could lead to higher mortgage rates Thursday.

The week’s most important piece of economic data is also arguably the single most important report that we see each month. The Labor Department will post May’s Employment data early Friday morning. This report gives us key employment readings such as the U.S. unemployment rate and the number of jobs added or lost during the month. Analysts are expecting to see the unemployment rate remain at 4.7% with approximately 170,000 new jobs added. An increase in unemployment and fewer new jobs than expected would be great news for the bond market. It would probably create a sizable rally in bonds, leading to lower mortgage rates Friday.

The Commerce Department will release the last report of the week with April’s Factory Orders data late Friday morning. This manufacturing sector report is similar to last week’s Durable Goods Orders release, but also includes orders for non-durable goods. It can cause some movement in the financial markets if it varies from forecasts by a wide margin, but it isn’t expected to cause much change in rates this month. Current forecasts are expecting to see a drop in orders of 1.5%. With the Employment report being released Friday, I don’t see this data having much influence on bond trading or mortgage rates.

Overall, I think we have a busy week ahead of us. With the markets closed tomorrow, Tuesday’s data will set the tone for the first part of the week. The big report of the week is Friday’s Employment data. I wouldn’ t be as concerned with the unemployment rate as with the number of new jobs added. The payroll number has been at the forefront of recent releases and will likely drive all of the financial markets Friday. The most volatility in rates will likely come Thursday or Friday, but Tuesday’s CCI report after a long weekend may also lead to rate changes. With three out of the week’s four trading days possible volatile sessions, please maintain contact with your mortgage professional.

If I were considering financing/refinancing a home, I would…. Lock if my closing was taking place within 7 days… Lock if my closing was taking place between 8 and 20 days… Float if my closing was taking place between 21 and 60 days… Float if my closing was taking place over 60 days from now… This is only my opinion of what I would do if I were financing a home. It is only an opinion and cannot be guaranteed to be in the best interest of all/any other borrowers.


Provided by a la mode

 



 

Permalink • Print • Comment